Transparency Report - Leverage Signals (Q1 2026)

At Blocksignal, one word mattered from day one: transparency. We’ve all seen the other side of this industry — loud promises, “exclusive” groups, and performance that goes quiet when markets go sideways. We built Blocksignal to do better: stay active across market phases and be honest about what our signals did (and didn’t) achieve. This blog section is dedicated to that commitment. Each quarter, we’ll share a straightforward review of the prior period — focusing on whether our communicated setups reached their key milestones, and what we learn along the way.

Q1 2026 — Leverage signals (Daytrader program)

In Q1 2026 (Jan 1 – Mar 31), we shared a steady stream of Leverage signals with our members in the Daytrader program. This report looks back at those signals at a high level and answers a simple question: did price reach the milestones we communicated (Entry, TP1, TP2)?

What was shared

Over the quarter we published 38 leverage signals across 29 distinct asset pairs. The mix naturally reflected the “attention cycles” of the market: large caps showed up repeatedly, while a long tail of mid/smaller caps appeared when liquidity and narrative momentum were there.

Just as importantly: leverage signals are not a single “bet.” They are a structured plan with milestones:

• Entry hit: price reached the communicated entry zone.
• TP1 hit: price reached the first take-profit area (the point where risk is usually reduced and profit can be realized).
• TP2 hit: price reached a second take-profit area (an additional objective, not required for a “good” outcome once TP1 has already been reached).

That last point matters: a TP2 miss is not the same kind of miss as a TP1 miss. If TP1 is hit, the trade idea had an opportunity to pay. TP2 is the stretch goal.

Scope & methodology

• Included: Program = Leverage, Post Type = Signal, Status = Posted, with Posted Date from 2026-01-01 (inclusive) to 2026-04-01 (exclusive).
• Hit labels are taken directly from the Signalliste fields: Entry Hit, TP1 Hit, TP2 Hit.
• A “Hit” means price touched the relevant zone/level, not that every member executed perfectly.
• This report is descriptive and for transparency; it is not investment advice.

KPI snapshot (Q1 2026)

(Infographic inserted in blog version.)

Key numbers:

• Signals shared: 38
• Asset pairs covered: 29
• Entry reached: 36 / 38 (94.7%)
• TP1 hit rate (given entry): 33 / 36 (91.7%)
• TP2 hit rate (given entry): 20 / 36 (55.6%)

What these numbers say

1) Entry reliability was high — and that’s the first job

With only two signals where entry was not reached, the quarter suggests that most communicated setups were aligned with the market’s actual path. That doesn’t mean every entry was “easy,” and it doesn’t guarantee good execution — but it does mean the price action tended to revisit the zones we expected.

In plain terms: ~95% of the signals hit their expected entry zone (36 / 38).

2) TP1 is the line between “idea” and “outcome”

TP1 is where a leverage idea starts behaving like a trade with a measurable edge: you have a moment to reduce exposure, lock some profit, and lower stress. In Q1, TP1 was hit on the majority of signals — 91.7% of the time when entry was reached — and three did not reach it after entry.

Those cases are the most useful to study, because they’re where the market either:

• turned early,
• chopped around without follow-through, or
• invalidated the premise before momentum could develop.

3) TP2 is a quality-of-follow-through metric, not a pass/fail grade

TP2 requires continuation, often through multiple sessions, and continuation is rarer than a first reaction move.

If TP1 is reached, a TP2 miss is often best understood as: “the market gave a tradable move, but not a full trend.” That’s not a failure; it’s information about regime.

4) Breadth across assets adds realism — and complexity

Covering 29 different pairs means the quarter wasn’t built around a single narrative. That’s good for avoiding “one-coin bias,” but it also raises the bar: different coins behave differently, volatility differs, and follow-through probabilities change. The KPI distribution you see is the result of navigating that diversity.

Closing

Transparency isn’t about claiming perfection — it’s about publishing the scoreboard. Q1 2026 shows strong entry engagement, a high hit rate on first profit objectives, and a more selective follow-through to second objectives (as expected in markets that don’t trend every time).

We’ll keep improving how we label “hits,” refine our invalidation logic, and keep sharing these quarterly snapshots so members (and we) can track reality, not vibes.